Less Is More: Buying Inexpensive Flowmeters

November 11, 2009

Accuracy, repeatability, reliability, installation ease, and price – these are some of the basic criteria on which flowmeters are selected. And while it may be preferred to have the best flowmeter that money can buy, it is not always necessary to buy that most expensive one. For example, you may not need the most accurate flowmeter available, whereas, the same is not necessarily true of repeatability – especially if you use your flowmeter to control a process or a batching operation. But even in such a case, you may not need to buy the most repeatable flowmeter available.

Reliability varies as well from flowmeter to flowmeter, between different flowmeter technologies and even within similar technologies. In fact, reliability may vary within a single manufacturer’s product line. And face it, reliability costs money: The more reliable the flowmeter is expected to be, the more costly its purchase price is anticipated to be.

In some cases, you may be able to purchase several “less reliable” flowmeters for the same price that you would pay for a single unit of the most reliable flowmeter. And sometimes, but not always, installation ease of a flowmeter costs more. Keep in mind that installation ease is not correlated with accuracy or reliability; sometimes you have to give up accuracy or even reliability to get easy installation.

Applied Cost Analysis Price is a fairly good indicator of a flowmeter’s limitations. But that doesn’t mean that it is a good indicator of “how good” the flowmeter actually is. “How good” is really a function of how well matched the flowmeter is for your application.

As applications get more difficult, the number of flowmeters that work will decrease and the price of the flowmeter that can perform well in that application will increase. Conversely, as applications become easier, the number of flowmeters that can perform well will increase, whereas the price of those flowmeters will drop. This is an important point. Many flowmeter users immediately purchase the kind of flowmeter they are familiar with or the kind they believe to be the most accurate or reliable without actually thinking through the application. In many cases, you can save time and money by evaluating the application first and then selecting the flowmeter based on what will actually fit the application. Indeed, you can often plan the application so that you can use an inexpensive flowmeter if you start early enough in the design stage.

For example, if you have a conductive liquid at ambient temperature and moderate pressure and you have provided sufficient straight run both up– and downstream from the meter and you have sized the meter to produce approximately 60 percent of signal at the application’s average flow rate, then you can use any flowmeter you want with the appropriate materials of construction. Or if you have a gas flow at reasonable temperature and pressure and you’ve provided an adequate piping configuration, then you are free to use many different types of gas-flow devices.

In another example, if you are simply totalizing flow over a daily, weekly or monthly period, a variety of flowmeters will be adequate. The longer the baseline over which you are totalizing, the more accurate your total will be, regardless of what flowmeter you use. The flow totals from sewer-flow data loggers that take data every five minutes or so are known to be as good as continuous measurements totalized in the same location.

As a final example, if you are controlling a metering pump or other chemical feed device, you need only have a flowmeter in which the accuracy is better than that of the chemical feed device itself. It isn’t necessary to use a terrifically accurate flowmeter with a chlorine gas feeder, which is accurate to +/-4 percent of full scale.

So how do you figure out if you can use an inexpensive flowmeter? Simply study your application. If the application parameters can be done with the inexpensive flowmeter to the desired accuracy, repeatability, reliability and cost effectiveness, then use the cheapest flowmeter you can find.

If you really want to make sure that you are getting the least expensive flowmeter that will work adequately in your application, reverse the field. Start by setting a cost target for the flowmeter. Set a low one. Examine all the flowmeters under that cost target against your application. If none fits, raise the cost target and redo from the start. Keep raising the cost target bar slightly; doing so will permit you to work with, as well as evaluate, different flowmeter types and those more costly flowmeters that were over the bar previously. Eventually you’ll hit a flowmeter that will perform adequately. Buy that one.

View our complete selection of Flow meters

About the Author Walt Boyes is a senior member of ISA and current vice president of ISA’s Publications Department. He is a writer and consultant who has delivered numerous technical papers. He has more than 25 years in the practice of flow control.


Oh sh*t, it’s on fire. Using a chemical compatibility database can save your job, and your life.

November 9, 2009

See if your materials pass the Chemical Compatibility test! 

Chemical Compatibility Database

When you are working with potentially hazardous chemicals, chemical compatibility is a crucial part of product selection, especially when selecting tubing, pumps, fittings, flowmeters, and other products. Using this database, you can be assured the materials that your products are made from will not be negatively affected by chemicals in the fluids or gases.

Our interactive online Chemical Compatibility Database is a smart, simple, and quick resource for finding the safest materials for your application. With its straightforward, easy-to-use interface, you’ll find definitive answers for all your chemical compatibility needs. It’s no wonder that this database is one of the most utilized tools on the Cole-Parmer Web site!

To see if your materials interact with the chemicals you wish to use, simply select your material and chemical used. If you have multiple materials or chemicals, you can select “All” to view a complete list of chemical effects. Click Submit to determine the compatibility level.

You can also refine your search by using the Compatibility Level option to see which materials have “A-Excellent” compatibility with a certain chemical.

For your safety, Cole-Parmer generally recommends those materials which have an “A-Excellent” compatibility with the selected chemical. You should never use a material with a chemical that has “D-Severe” compatibility.

Don’t forget to bookmark the Chemical Compatibility Database—this simple and important tool is guaranteed to help keep your workspace safe!

Chemical Compatibility Database


Stop! Don’t drink that water. Check out this brief article on Water Testing.

November 6, 2009


Water testing is the continous sampling of various liquid streams and the analysis of their quality. These liquid streams include watercourses such as rivers and lakes, groundwater, recirculated cooling streams, boiler feedwater or condensate, and process effluents.

Water testing is not only a vital element of preserving a safe public drinking supply and a healthy environment, it can also improve industrial process efficiency for better products at reduced cost.

Our selection of water testing equipment includes test kits for bacteria and chemical compounds; colorimeters; multiparameter meters for measuring pH, ORP, conductivity/ salinity/total dissolved solids (TDS), dissolved oxygen (DO), and temperature; and turbidimeters.

Bacterial Test Kits

Eliminate time-consuming culture/plating techniques for convenient bacterial counts and assays.

Colorimeters

Measure the light absorbed by your sample after it reacts with a reagent that produces a color change. Since the intensity of absorbed light is proportional to the concentration of the compound, colorimeters accurately indicate the concentration of various compounds in your sample. Many colorimeters work with specific test kits for easy analysis. This reduces operator error, whether in reading color changes or in measuring reagents.

Multiparameter Meters

Measure pH, ORP, conductivity/salinity/total dissolved solids (TDS), and/or dissolved oxygen (DO)/biological oxygen demand (BOD).

Test Kits for Chemical Compounds

Contain prepared reagents and standards that let you easily determine the concentration of specific compounds in the sample. We offer titrimetric and colorimetric test kits for several compounds including ammonia, chlorine, carbon dioxide, heavy metals, and many others.

Colorimetric test kits:  These tests determine the concentration of a substance. The higher the concentration of a substance, the darker the color developed in the test.

Other elements can interfere with the accuracy of the tests. Read kit instructions for appropriate adjustments.

Titrimetric test kits: The concentration of a substance in a sample solution can be determined by titrimetic tests. After the sample is treated with an indicator, a standard titrant is added until a color change indicates a completed reaction. The amount of titrant used coresponds to the concentration of the substance being tested.

Turbidimeters

Turbidity in water is caused by suspended and colloidal matter such as clay, silt, finely divided organic and inorganic matter, and plankton and other microscopic organisms.

Quantify the turbidity of your sample by measuring the light scattered at a 90¡ angle to a source light beam. The meter compares the light scattered by sample particulates to light-scattered in a fluid with known turbidity and displays the measurement in nephelometric turbity units (NTU). The presence of dissolved, color-causing substances that absorb light may cause a negative interference.

Turbidimeters with scattered-light detectors located at 90° to the incident beam are called nephelometers. Nephelometers are relatively unaffected by small differences in design parameters and therefore are specified as the standard instrument for measurement of low turbidities. Poor measurement technique can have a greater effect on measurement error than small differences in instrument design.

Determine turbidity as soon as possible after sample is collected to ensure examination under original conditions.

  1. Gently agitate samples to ensure a representative measurement. If storage is required, cool to 4°C to minimize microbiological decomposition of solids.
  2. Keep cells scrupulously clean, inside and out, and discard if scratched or etched. Never handle them near the instrument’s light beam.
  3. Fill cells with samples and standards—allow sufficient time for bubbles to escape. Because small differences between sample cells can significantly impact measurement, use either matched pairs of cells or the same cell for both standardization and sample measurement.

Coagulation-Flocculation Jar Test of Water: This is a general procedure for the evaluation of a treatment to reduce dissolved, suspended, colloidal, and nonsettleable matter from water by chemical coagulation-flocculation, followed by gravity settling. The practice provides a systematic evaluation of the variables normally encountered in the coagulation-flocculation process. The coagulation-flocculation test is carried out to determine the chemical, dosages, and conditions required to achieve optimum results. The primary variables to be investigated using the recommended practice include, (but are not limited to): chemical additives, pH, temperature, and the order of addition and mixing conditions.

Significance: This jar test permits the evaluation of various coagulants and coagulant aids used in the treatment of water and waste water for the same water and the same experimental conditions. The effects of concentration of the coagulants and coagulant aids and their order of addition can also be evaluated by this practice.

View our complete selection of Water and Industrial Liquid Sampling products.
View our complete selection of Water Purification products.
View our complete selection of Water Testing products.

Related Articles

Good Laboratory Practices for Taking Turbidity Measurements
Water Purification


Biowarfare Threat Detection

November 4, 2009

It’s 7:45 a.m. Just your average Tuesday morning. You’re waiting in line for the coffee machine at work when the sudden shriek of a fire alarm splits the air. A puff of white powder from an envelope in the mail room across the hall has coworkers streaming out the exits as a call goes out to the local emergency response team. It will be up to these first responders, with their handheld bioagent detection devices, to determine if this scare is a hoax or the real deal.

Biowarfare Agent Detector

 

Biowarfare agent detection kits have become one of local government’s most coveted weapons in the war on terrorism. They are carried by emergency units likely to be first on the scene—from fire departments, police and sheriff’s personnel, emergency medical teams and HAZMAT units, to Federal emergency management teams and privately hired corporate security professionals. They are designed to address the second step in a biowarfare incident response: identifying whether there is a credible threat posed by the incident while field samples are sent to a lab for next-day confirmation.

 

A credible threat is defined as the presence of a biowarfare agent in sufficient quantity to represent a threat to people who come into contact with the substance. A single infectious dose (I.D.) of anthrax is approximately 10,000 spores, or 10 nanograms, which is about 1/100th the size of a single speck of dust. Clearly, locating this amount in an average size room is virtually impossible. However, in the case of actual bioterrorism activity to date, as well as the many thousands of hoax incidents that occur much more frequently, the amounts used have been much larger. For example, the letter sent to Senator Daschle’s office in October 2001 contained approximately 2 grams of material, the equivalent of about 200,000 infectious doses.

 

To ensure accuracy of results, detectors such as the new BioWarfare Agent Detection Device (BADD) carried by Cole-Parmer, are rated to detect at least 1/4 of a speck of dust (250 micrograms) and have been found capable of identifying anthrax spores in amounts as small as 1 nanogram, or 1/1000 of a speck of dust without generating false positive results from “close cousin” bacteria such as Bacillus globigil.

 

These self-contained, first response kits operate much like a home pregnancy test. They rely on a simple swabbing of the suspicious powder or liquid, which is then diluted with a special diluent and placed, in droplets, into a self-contained cassette-type test strip. The results, positive or negative, are available and visible to the human eye in three to 30 minutes, depending upon the concentration of the sample tested.

 

In the case of the BADD detector, which is capable of testing for ricin and botulinum toxins, and three strains of anthrax (Ames, Vollum, and Sterne), two test lines containing antibodies specific to the biowarfare agent being tested for “light up” when the agent is present in the sample—thus signaling a “positive” reading. If only one “control” line appears in the detection device window, it signifies a “negative” reading.

 

Although not as sophisticated as the $10,000- to $100,000-per-unit electronic reader systems used by the military and others, these sensitive test kits are easily transported, and provide all necessary materials to collect and test multiple samples in the field. Moreover, at roughly $50 per test, they are reliable and cost-effective, allowing wide deployment and use at minimal cost.

 

[As for the Federal government's recommendations, recent guidelines from the General Services Administration targeted specifically for mail handling at Federal agency mail rooms stated that handheld assay tests may produce unreliable results in certain circumstances and recommended that all samples be sent to certified laboratories for processing. However, as of August 2, 2002, the International Association of Fire Chiefs (IAFC) withdrew its support of the ban, and directed fire departments and other first responders to follow the Centers for Disease Control guidelines for handling potential exposure to anthrax, and strongly advised fire departments to not rely solely upon handheld devices. These guidelines are consistent with the recommendations of all the major field detection device manufacturers.]

 

View our complete selection of Bacteria test kits
View our complete selection of Biowarfare Agent Detection Devices (BADD)

 


How Safe are Your Safety Gloves?

October 28, 2009
Safety Glove Chemical Compatibility Database

Safety Glove Chemical Compatibility Database

To help you choose the proper safety gloves, Cole-Parmer offers a detailed Safety Glove Chemical Compatibility Database* containing information about how glove materials interact with various chemicals. This convenient resource eliminates the time you spend sorting through multiple Web sites and paper charts to determine compatibility. Simply select your chemical from more than 190 options. A chart will appear listing specific gloves (culled from a variety of glove manufacturers) and how they are rated for that material.

The database rates the glove material and chemical compatibility by degradation and permeability. Degradation refers to a reduction in one or more physical properties of a glove material. For example, when coming into contact with a particular chemical, certain gloves may become stiff or brittle and their performance is impaired.

On the other hand, permeation enables a chemical to pass through a protective film without going through pinholes, pores, or other visible openings. The chemical’s molecules enter the film and pass between the molecules of the glove. This process is not always visible to the eye and can also reduce safety.

Keep in mind that permeation and degradation are not always correlated. In addition to these quality-specific ratings, the database offers an overall rating for chemical compatibility (from excellent to not recommended).

Test-drive the Safety Glove Chemical Compatibility Database today.

*Note: The information in the Safety Glove Chemical Compatibility Database was supplied to Cole-Parmer by other reputable sources and is to be used ONLY as a guide in selecting gloves for chemical compatibility testing. Variability in material thickness, chemical concentration, temperature, and length of exposure to chemicals will affect specific performance. Always test the products with the specific chemicals and under the specific conditions of your application.


Protect yourself from the H1N1 flu!

October 7, 2009

Pandemic Preparedness:
Local Preparation for a Global Issue

Over the past several months there has been a flurry of news activity surrounding pandemic flu (specifically swine and bird flu) and preparations at the global, federal, and local level to address this concern. It can be difficult for those in private industry and for those government customers not directly involved in planning to understand their role.

Business continuity planning for this type of event can have far-reaching benefits. The same strategies adopted for pandemic preparedness can be modified for use in similar catastrophes. Health and Human Services (HHS), in partnership with the Centers for Disease Control, has developed guidelines to assist businesses with planning efforts. A host of additional resources are available to become informed on pandemic flu and to develop sound contingency plans. Planning and preparing now will have a positive impact on an organization’s survival during times of crisis.

Full Article, contains links to planning checklists and other excellent resources.
 

Respiratory Protection: Preparing Workplaces for an Influenza Breakout

An influenza outbreak in a workplace can deliver a devasting blow to productivity and morale. Learn ways to best protect your place of business from an outbreak and how to maintain operations should a pandemic occur. Full Story


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,376 other followers